Publication Ethics
Indonesia Interpolitica Journal (IIJ) is a peer-reviewed journal. It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, and the publisher. This statement is based on Practice Guidelines for publication as in the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE’s Best).
In addition, every full paper submitted to IIJ will be screened using Turnitin (an Internet-based plagiarism-prevention service) to detect possible plagiarism.
AUTHORS
Reporting Standard
- Authors are expected to have made reasonable attempts to check and validate results submitted to the journal for publication.
- Authors should provide authentic research data.
- Authors should confirm that the journal has not been published in another journal.
- Authors are required to cite the sources correctly, considering the content of the manuscript, whether in the form of written publications or personal interviews.
Originality and plagiarism
The authors should confirm that they have written entirely original works and that if they have used the work and/or words of others, this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication
Authors should not submit or publish the same manuscript to multiple journals or primary publications.
Authorship of the Paper
- Authorship should be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported research.
- All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors.
- Where others have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
Data Access and Retention
Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review. In any event, they should be prepared to keep such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
- All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript.
- All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
- When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, the author must promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
- Suppose the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error. In that case, the author must promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.
EDITORS
Fair Play
An editor assesses manuscripts based only on the originality and the quality of the paper and should not be affected by religious, national, political, or any other influences.
Confidentiality
The editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in editors' research without the author's express written consent.
PEER REVIEWERS
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
- Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions, and editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in adequately assessing and judging the submitted paper.
- Reviewers should immediately inform the editor if plagiarism is identified within the submitted work.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editors and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. The reviewers should express their views clearly and with supporting rational arguments.
Acknowledgment of Sources
- Reviewers should point out relevant published work that has not been cited in the article.
- Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation.
- A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper they know personally.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
- Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
- Reviewers should not consider manuscripts with conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any authors or institutions connected to the papers.
PUBLISHER
- Indonesia Interpolitica Journal (IIJ)is committed to ensuring that commercial interests do not impact or influence editorial decisions.
- Indonesia Interpolitica Journal (IIJ) will assist in communications with other journals where this is useful to the authors.
- Indonesia Interpolitica Journal (IIJ) works closely with all related divisions to set standards for best practices on ethical matters, errors, and retractions--and is prepared to provide specialized legal review and counsel if necessary.